From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Sacks

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 15, 1961
172 N.E.2d 915 (Ohio 1961)

Opinion

No. 36775

Decided March 15, 1961.

Habeas corpus — Release from custody of warden of penitentiary sought — Relief prayed for denied — Petitioner not in custody of such warden.

IN HABEAS CORPUS.

Petitioner, Smith, has invoked the original jurisdiction of this court by this proceeding in habeas corpus to obtain his release from the Ohio Penitentiary.

He was indicted for the crime of burglary, tried to a jury, found guilty and sentenced to the Ohio Penitentiary. He contends that his maximum sentence has expired, that, therefore, he is being held illegally and unlawfully in violation of his constitutional rights, and that he is entitled to his release.

The respondent's amended return states that petitioner was found to be schizophrenic and in need of the special custody, care, and treatment available at Lima State Hospital, and that custody of petitioner was, for that reason, transferred to the Superintendent of Lima State Hospital.

Mr. Jack Smith, in propria persona. Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.


The petitioner not now being in the custody of respondent, Warden of the Ohio Penitentiary, the relief prayed for must be denied.

Relief denied.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Sacks

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 15, 1961
172 N.E.2d 915 (Ohio 1961)
Case details for

Smith v. Sacks

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. SACKS, WARDEN

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 15, 1961

Citations

172 N.E.2d 915 (Ohio 1961)
172 N.E.2d 915

Citing Cases

Sakacsi v. McGettrick Sheriff

The questions presented by this appeal are, therefore, now moot. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed on the…

McDonald v. Keiter

However, it was conceded by appellant's counsel during oral argument before this court that appellant…