From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Quezada

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 28, 2024
23-cv-05615 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 28, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05615 BLF (PR)

05-28-2024

DEANDRE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. REBECCA QUEZADA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical staff at Marin County Jail. Dkt. No. 1. This matter assigned to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins. Dkt. No. 3. When Plaintiff filed an In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) application which was deficient, Dkt. No. 5, Judge Cousins granted Plaintiff an extension of time to file a complete application within twenty-eight days of the order filed on February 29, 2024. Dkt. No. 6. On March 22, 2024, the copy of the court order sent to Plaintiff was returned as undelivered, with the enveloped marked “NIC” (not in custody). Dkt. No. 7. This matter was reassigned to the undersigned on May 24, 2024. Dkt. Nos. 8, 9.

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11, a party proceeding pro se must promptly file a notice of change of address while an action is pending. See L.R. 3-11(a). The Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a petition when: (1) mail directed to the pro se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable, and (2) the Court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from the pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b).

More than sixty days have passed since mail addressed to Plaintiff was first returned as undeliverable on March 22, 2024, because he was not custody. Dkt. No. 7. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff of a new address or any further communication from him. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 3-11 of the Northern District Local Rules.

The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Quezada

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 28, 2024
23-cv-05615 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. Quezada

Case Details

Full title:DEANDRE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. REBECCA QUEZADA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 28, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05615 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 28, 2024)