Smith v. Public Service Ry. Co.

Full title: CATHERINE SMITH, RESPONDENT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 1, 1926

132 A. 923 (N.J. 1926)

132 A. 923

Opinion

Argued February 3, 1926 —

Decided April 1, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 993.

For the respondent, Henry P. Bedford.

For the appellant, Leonard J. Tynan.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, KALISCH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.