From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1935
181 S.E. 325 (N.C. 1935)

Opinion

(Filed 18 September, 1935.)

Appeal and Error J d —

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by defendants from Frizzelle, J., at February Term, 1935, of COLUMBUS.

Lyon Lyon and R. H. Burns Son for plaintiff.

E. M. Toon and John D. Bellamy Sons for defendants.


Civil action to recover damages for loss of plaintiff's right foot, it being alleged that the injury complained of was caused by the neglect or default of the defendants.

The usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence, last clear chance, and damages were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants appeal, assigning errors.


The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed in accordance with the usual practice of appellate courts, and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N.C. 803, 157 S.E. 136; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N.C. 840, 161 S.E. 223.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Powell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1935
181 S.E. 325 (N.C. 1935)
Case details for

Smith v. Powell

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LOVETT SMITH v. L. R. POWELL, JR., AND E. W. SMITH, RECEIVERS OF…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1935

Citations

181 S.E. 325 (N.C. 1935)
208 N.C. 837