From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Pineda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 16, 2015
Case No. 1:12-CV-196 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-CV-196

04-16-2015

KENNETH SMITH, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO PINEDA, Warden, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ENTRY AND ORDER

Petitioner having filed his Motion for Leave to File an Amended and Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (doc. 46) on April 13, 2015, within the Court's previously ordered time frame, the Court DENIES, as moot, the Petitioner's appeal of the Court's Decision and Order (doc. 43) denying the Petitioner's Fourth Motion to Extend the Stay of Consideration of his Lethal-Injections Claims and to Extend the Time to File his Motion for Leave to Amend his Habeas Petition with Amended Lethal Injections Claims (doc. 40).

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this 16th day of April, 2015.

s/Thoms M. Rose

THOMAS M. ROSE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Smith v. Pineda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 16, 2015
Case No. 1:12-CV-196 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Pineda

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH SMITH, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO PINEDA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 16, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:12-CV-196 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2015)