From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Paxton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION
Dec 3, 2012
NO: 2:12CV00142 SWW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 3, 2012)

Opinion

NO: 2:12CV00142 SWW

12-03-2012

LESTER SMITH, III REG. #03957-095 PLAINTIFF v. JOHNNY PAXTON et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

The record reflects that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition mailed to plaintiff at his last known address were returned to the Clerk on November 27, 2012, marked by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable. It is the responsibility of a pro se plaintiff to notify the Clerk of any change in his address. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket entry #19) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.

Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Paxton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION
Dec 3, 2012
NO: 2:12CV00142 SWW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Paxton

Case Details

Full title:LESTER SMITH, III REG. #03957-095 PLAINTIFF v. JOHNNY PAXTON et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION

Date published: Dec 3, 2012

Citations

NO: 2:12CV00142 SWW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 3, 2012)