From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 14, 2009
356 F. App'x 646 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 09-6680, 09-7540.

Submitted: November 24, 2009.

Decided: December 14, 2009.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:07-cv-03644-PMD).

Kevin Smith, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, Davidson Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Vinton D. Lide, Michael Stephen Pauley, Lide Pauley, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina; Christopher R. Antley, Devlin Parkinson, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Smith, a/k/a Bar None Royal Blackness, appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing two Defendants because the Defendants were not state actors and granting summary judgment to the remaining Defendants and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Ozmint, No. 9:07-cv-03644-PMD, 2009 WL 692828 (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2009); 2009 WL 2226194 (July 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Ozmint

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 14, 2009
356 F. App'x 646 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. Ozmint

Case Details

Full title:Kevin SMITH, a/k/a Royal Blackness, a/k/a Bar None, Plaintiff-Appellant…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 14, 2009

Citations

356 F. App'x 646 (4th Cir. 2009)