From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Ooms

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Sep 30, 1947
166 F.2d 211 (D.C. Cir. 1947)

Opinion

No. 9399.

Argued April 10, 1947.

Decided September 30, 1947.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Suit to obtain a patent by Alonzo L. Smith against Casper W. Ooms, Commissioner of Patents. From a judgment of dismissal, the plaintiff appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Lester B. Clark, of Houston, Tex., with whom Mr. Emmett Leo Sheehan, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Edwin L. Reynolds, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. W.W. Cochran, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, and Howard S. Miller, both of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and EDGERTON and PRETTYMAN, Associate Justices.


This is a suit to obtain a patent. R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. The Patent Office found that the claims lacked invention.

The finding was a reasonable one. The District Court was therefore right in dismissing the bill. Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D.C. 195, 109 F.2d 449.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Ooms

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Sep 30, 1947
166 F.2d 211 (D.C. Cir. 1947)
Case details for

Smith v. Ooms

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. OOMS, Commissioner of Patents

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Sep 30, 1947

Citations

166 F.2d 211 (D.C. Cir. 1947)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Kingsland

The District Court was therefore right in dismissing the complaint. Abbott v. Coe, 1939, 71 App.D.C. 195, 109…

Smith v. Florence-Mayo Nuway Co.

See Altoona Publix Theatres v. American Tri-Ergon Corp., 294 U.S. 477, 492, 55 S.Ct. 455, 79 L.Ed. 1005;…