From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. North Carolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 2, 2012
474 F. App'x 895 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6458

08-02-2012

PATRICK RICARDO SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee.

Patrick Ricardo Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00542-RJC)

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Ricardo Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Patrick Ricardo Smith seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Smith v. North Carolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 2, 2012
474 F. App'x 895 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. North Carolina

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK RICARDO SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 2, 2012

Citations

474 F. App'x 895 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Hooks

Id. at 3-5. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability and…

Smith v. Hooks

Id. at 3-5. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability and…