From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Noble Drilling Corp.

U.S.
Jan 29, 1968
390 U.S. 143 (1968)

Summary

In Smith v. Noble Drilling Corp., 1968, 390 U.S. 143, 88 S.Ct. 841, 19 L.Ed.2d 970 the Supreme Court remanded for further consideration in light of Billiot.

Summary of this case from Cates v. United States

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.

No. 648.

Decided January 29, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner.

W. Ford Reese for respondent.


The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana is granted. The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F.2d 662 (C.A. 5th Cir. 1967), and Loffland Brothers Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F.2d 528 (C.A. 5th Cir. 1967).


Summaries of

Smith v. Noble Drilling Corp.

U.S.
Jan 29, 1968
390 U.S. 143 (1968)

In Smith v. Noble Drilling Corp., 1968, 390 U.S. 143, 88 S.Ct. 841, 19 L.Ed.2d 970 the Supreme Court remanded for further consideration in light of Billiot.

Summary of this case from Cates v. United States
Case details for

Smith v. Noble Drilling Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v . NOBLE DRILLING CORP

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 29, 1968

Citations

390 U.S. 143 (1968)

Citing Cases

Trexler v. Tug Raven

The Court may control the issuance of an execution on this judgment. The doctrine enunciated in Billiot and…

Cates v. United States

Importantly, we did not hold that a failure to reserve rights expressly surrendered those rights, but rather…