From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Nev. Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 21, 2023
2:23-cv-01745-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01745-JDP (HC)

08-21-2023

BRODY JAMES SMITH, Petitioner, v. NEVADA COUNTY JAIL, Respondent.


ORDER

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Nev. Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 21, 2023
2:23-cv-01745-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Nev. Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:BRODY JAMES SMITH, Petitioner, v. NEVADA COUNTY JAIL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 21, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01745-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2023)