From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Montemayor

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 5, 2013
2:13-cv-1070 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2013)

Opinion


JOSHUA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. NOEMI MONTEMAYOR, Defendant. No. 2:13-cv-1070 AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 5, 2013

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the appropriate filing fee.

         In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

         2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.


Summaries of

Smith v. Montemayor

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 5, 2013
2:13-cv-1070 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Montemayor

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. NOEMI MONTEMAYOR, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 5, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-1070 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2013)