From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Miller

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 20, 2008
296 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-7156.

Submitted: October 14, 2008.

Decided: October 20, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (9:07-cv-01774-HFF).

Roy L. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. John Evans James, III, John E. James II Law Office, Winnsboro, South Carolina; Lucy Grey Wilson Mclver, Lee, Erter, Wilson, James, Holler Smith, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Roy L. Smith appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Miller, No. 9:07-cv-01774-HFF, 2008 WL 2433828 (D.S.C. June 16, 2008). We deny Smith's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Miller

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 20, 2008
296 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:Roy L. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. Redfearn MILLER, Grievance…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 20, 2008

Citations

296 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2008)