From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Microsoft Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Aug 8, 2017
No. 2:17-CV-00211-SMJ (E.D. Wash. Aug. 8, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:17-CV-00211-SMJ

08-08-2017

CHARMANE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO CLOSE FILE

By Order filed June 14, 2017, the Plaintiff was directed to proffer the full filing fee, show cause why prepayment would be inappropriate, or submit a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within thirty days.

There has been no response to the court's Order. Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED the file of the captioned matter be CLOSED.

OBJECTIONS

Any party may object to a magistrate judge's proposed findings, recommendations or report within fourteen (14) days following service with a copy thereof. Such party shall file written objections with the Clerk of the Court and serve objections on all parties, specifically identifying any the portions to which objection is being made, and the basis therefor. Any response to the objection shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after receipt of the objection Attention is directed to FED. R. CIV. P. 6(d), which adds additional time after certain kinds of service.

A district judge will make a de novo determination of those portions to which objection is made and may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's determination. The judge need not conduct a new hearing or hear arguments and may consider the magistrate judge's record and make an independent determination thereon. The judge may, but is not required to, accept or consider additional evidence, or may recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 621 (9th Cir. 2000); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3); LMR 4, Local Rules for the Eastern District of Washington. A magistrate judge's recommendation cannot be appealed to a court of appeals; only the district judge's order or judgment can be appealed.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to file this Report and Recommendation and provide a copy to Plaintiff and to Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr.

DATED August 8, 2017.

/s/_________

JOHN T. RODGERS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Microsoft Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Aug 8, 2017
No. 2:17-CV-00211-SMJ (E.D. Wash. Aug. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Smith v. Microsoft Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHARMANE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: Aug 8, 2017

Citations

No. 2:17-CV-00211-SMJ (E.D. Wash. Aug. 8, 2017)