From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Mich. Pallet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 23, 2015
498 Mich. 955 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 151963. COA No. 318702.

12-23-2015

Colby SMITH, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. MICHIGAN PALLET, INC., Jonathan J. Poortenga, and Kenneth Engelsma, Defendants–Appellants, and LPS Equipment & Acquisition Company, Inc., Adrian Rocskay, Todd Strong, James Kivell, and John Doe, Defendants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Lenawee Circuit Court for entry of an order granting the motion for summary disposition filed by the defendants-appellants. The Court of Appeals erred by finding that the plaintiff established a prima facie case of an intentional tort falling within the exception to the worker's compensation exclusive remedy that is found at MCL 418.131(1). There is no evidence in this case that the defendants had a specific intent to injure the plaintiff. Nor does the evidence establish that the defendants “had actual knowledge that an injury was certain to occur and willfully disregarded that knowledge.” Id. See also Travis v. Dreis & Krump Mfg. Co., 453 Mich. 149, 551 N.W.2d 132 (1996).


Summaries of

Smith v. Mich. Pallet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 23, 2015
498 Mich. 955 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Mich. Pallet, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Colby SMITH, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. MICHIGAN PALLET, INC., Jonathan J…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Dec 23, 2015

Citations

498 Mich. 955 (Mich. 2015)
872 N.W.2d 494

Citing Cases

Barnes v. Sun Chem. Corp.

Further, that some supervisors may have known employees were "bypassing" the safety measures by walking…