From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. McNeal

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 4, 2009
Civil Action 2:09-cv-00775 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:09-cv-00775.

December 4, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff Metecia Smith brings this action alleging that defendant committed malpractice. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's September 16, 2009 Report and Recommendation that defendant that this action is barred by the one year statute of limitations for malpractice actions.

No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for defendant. This action is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Smith v. McNeal

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 4, 2009
Civil Action 2:09-cv-00775 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. McNeal

Case Details

Full title:Metecia Smith, Plaintiff v. E. Darren McNeal, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 4, 2009

Citations

Civil Action 2:09-cv-00775 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 4, 2009)