From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. McCorkle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 9, 1938
254 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

March 9, 1938.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.


Order so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We believe the allegations contained in the portions of defendant McCorkle's answer remaining after the excision of the "third defense and counterclaim" are sufficient to test his right to the relief which his pleading demands. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from grants plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant's counterclaim and to strike out certain defenses in defendant's answer, in an action to compel specific performance.)


Summaries of

Smith v. McCorkle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 9, 1938
254 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Smith v. McCorkle

Case Details

Full title:DANA W. SMITH, 614 North Main Street, Jamestown, New York, and CHARLES W…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)