From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Mabus

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 10, 2011
428 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-2429.

Submitted: April 27, 2011.

Decided: May 10, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM).

Bruce E. Smith, Appellant pro se.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Bruce E. Smith appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for nonpayment of filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Malms, No. 2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19; entered Oct. 20, 2010 Nov. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Mabus

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 10, 2011
428 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Smith v. Mabus

Case Details

Full title:Bruce E. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ray MABUS, Secretary Dept. of the…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 10, 2011

Citations

428 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2011)