From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Lothrop

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 16, 2023
No. CV-22-01324-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Oct. 16, 2023)

Opinion

CV-22-01324-PHX-SMB

10-16-2023

Adam Smith, Plaintiff, v. William W Lothrop, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HON. SUSAN M. BRNOVICH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Michael Morrissey has issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed without prejudice (Doc. 13). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 5) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of Magistrate Judge Morrissey. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 13) is accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this matter without prejudice and directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this case.


Summaries of

Smith v. Lothrop

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 16, 2023
No. CV-22-01324-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Oct. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Lothrop

Case Details

Full title:Adam Smith, Plaintiff, v. William W Lothrop, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Oct 16, 2023

Citations

No. CV-22-01324-PHX-SMB (D. Ariz. Oct. 16, 2023)