From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Labor Commission

Utah Court of Appeals
Sep 20, 2007
2007 UT App. 306 (Utah Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 20061169-CA.

Filed September 20, 2007. NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

Original Proceeding in this Court.

Floyd W. Holm, Salt Lake City, for Petitioners.

Phillip B. Shell, Murray, and Alan L. Hennebold, Salt Lake City, for Respondents.

Before Judges Bench, McHugh, and Thorne.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


Dale T. Smith Sons and the Workers' Compensation Fund (collectively Petitioners) seek review of the Utah Labor Commission's order requiring that they pay 100% of Jeffrey D. Smith's medical expenses related to treatment of his lumbar degenerative joint disease. Petitioners argue that the Labor Commission incorrectly interpreted Utah Code section 34A-3-110 when it determined that medical expenses are not "compensation" subject to apportionment under that section. See Utah Code Ann. § 34A-3-110 (2005).

In Ameritech Library Services v. Labor Commission, 2007 UT App 305, a companion case that was briefed concurrently with this case, we rejected arguments identical to those raised by Petitioners. InAmeritech we held that the term "compensation," as used in section 34A-3-110, does not include medical expenses and that apportionment of medical expenses is not appropriate under that section of the Utah Occupational Disease Act. See id. at ¶¶ 14-16. For the reasons stated in that decision, we affirm.

Affirmed.

WE CONCUR: Russell W. Bench, Presiding Judge, William A. Thorne Jr., Judge.


Summaries of

Smith v. Labor Commission

Utah Court of Appeals
Sep 20, 2007
2007 UT App. 306 (Utah Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Smith v. Labor Commission

Case Details

Full title:Dale T. Smith Sons and Workers' Compensation Fund, Petitioners, v. Labor…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 20, 2007

Citations

2007 UT App. 306 (Utah Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Smith Sons v. Utah Labor Com'n

In awarding payment to Mr. Smith, the ALJ relied on the Labor Commission Appeals Board Order on Motion for…