From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Kim

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 7, 2022
3:22-cv-00622 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00622

11-07-2022

BRANDON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SOO W. KIM and SOONJA KIM, Defendants.


JEFFREY S. FRENSLEY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF JUDGE

On October 10, 2022, Plaintiff Brandon Smith filed a Motion for Entry of Default against Defendants Soo W. Kim and Soonja Kim. (Doc. No. 14). Pursuant to Local Rule 55.01, “[m]otions for entry of default under Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a) must be accompanied by an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 verifying: (i) proof of service; (ii) the opposing party's failure to plead or otherwise defend; (iii) if the opposing party is an individual, that the opposing party is not a minor or incompetent person; and, (iv) if the opposing party is an individual, that the opposing party is not in the military service, as required by 50 U.S.C. § 3931(b)(1).” L.R. 55.01 (emphasis added). Plaintiff's Motion is procedurally defective as it fails comply with Local Rule 55.01. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. No. 14) is DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Smith v. Kim

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 7, 2022
3:22-cv-00622 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Kim

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SOO W. KIM and SOONJA KIM, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00622 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 7, 2022)