From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Kaufman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 31, 1995
654 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-1684.

May 31, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Leroy H. Moe, J.

Douglas P. Johnson, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder of the Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Cindy Shatkin Avidan of the Law Offices of Ponzan Avidan, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.


Appellant argues that a $3,000 jury verdict was grossly inadequate, and that the trial court therefore erred in denying her motion for a new trial. We agree, because, although some of her injuries alleged to have resulted from this accident may have existed before the accident, even defendant's physician admitted that plaintiff had a permanent disability as a result of an ankle injury caused by this accident, and the surgical expenses for the ankle alone exceeded the verdict. See Skelly v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., 445 So.2d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial on damages.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Kaufman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 31, 1995
654 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Smith v. Kaufman

Case Details

Full title:CARETIA W. SMITH, APPELLANT, v. IRVING KAUFMAN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 31, 1995

Citations

654 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)