From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. J.P. Morgan Chase

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 19, 2013
3:11-CV-0314-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 19, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-CV-0314-LRH (VPC)

02-19-2013

MARLENE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Before the court is defendants' motion to seal (#158) and supplement to motion to seal (#163). Plaintiff opposed the motion (#165), and defendants replied (#168).

IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion to seal (#158) is GRANTED. Defendants have leave to file certain policies and procedures at issue under seal. Defendants shall also have leave to file approximately 50 pages of email correspondence at issue under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Smith v. J.P. Morgan Chase

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 19, 2013
3:11-CV-0314-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. J.P. Morgan Chase

Case Details

Full title:MARLENE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

3:11-CV-0314-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 19, 2013)