From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Intel Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 31, 2024
4:23-cv-05761-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-05761-HSG

01-31-2024

Smith, et al. Plaintiff(s), v. Intel Corporation Defendant(s).


APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE; ORDER (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)

I, Edward Maxwell Grauman, an active member in good standing of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the Northern District of California representing: Plaintiffs Darques Smith, et al. in the above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is Allison Watson Cross , an attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office within the State of California. Local co-counsel's bar number is: 328596.

(Image Omitted)

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: 24081931.

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said bar is attached to this application.

I have been granted pro hac vice admission by the Court times in the 12 months preceding this application.

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: January 31, 2024

Edward Maxwell Grauman APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of Edward Maxwell Grauman is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local cocounsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.

The Supreme Court of Texas

AUSTIN

CLERK'S OFFICE

I, BLAKE HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, certify that the records of this office show that

Edward Maxwell Grauman

was duly admitted and licensed as an attorney and counselor at law by the Supreme Court of Texas on the 9th day of August, 2012.

I further certify that the records of this office show that, as of this date

Edward Maxwell Grauman

is presently enrolled with the State Bar of Texas as an active member in good standing.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF witness my signature and the seal of the Supreme Court of Texas at the City of Austin, this, the 6th day of January, 2024.


Summaries of

Smith v. Intel Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 31, 2024
4:23-cv-05761-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. Intel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Smith, et al. Plaintiff(s), v. Intel Corporation Defendant(s).

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-05761-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)