From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Holder

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 26, 2012
568 U.S. 1022 (2012)

Opinion

No. 12–6530.

2012-11-26

Adrian Marion SMITH, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, et al.


Case below, 473 Fed.Appx. 278.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).


Summaries of

Smith v. Holder

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 26, 2012
568 U.S. 1022 (2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:Adrian Marion SMITH, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Nov 26, 2012

Citations

568 U.S. 1022 (2012)
133 S. Ct. 665
184 L. Ed. 2d 453
81 U.S.L.W. 3288