From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-1614 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-1614 MCE CKD P

03-04-2016

GRANVILLE WILLIAM SMITH, Plaintiff, v. T. HERNANDEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. ///// ///// ///// ///// /////

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 13) is denied. Dated: March 4, 2016

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1/mp
smit1614.31


Summaries of

Smith v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-1614 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:GRANVILLE WILLIAM SMITH, Plaintiff, v. T. HERNANDEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 4, 2016

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-1614 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2016)