From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Geico

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 21, 2003
CASE NO. C03-0537 WHA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2003)

Opinion

CASE NO. C03-0537 WHA

February 21, 2003

Stephen M. Hayes (SBN 83583), Stephen P. Ellingson (SBN 136505), Ropers, Majeski, Kohn Bentey, San Jose, CA, Attorneys for Defendant GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY (Erroneously sued as GEICO)

Law Offices of Donald L. Galine, Donald L. Galine, David Smith, Bettina Thompson Smith, Taylor Smith, Attorney for Plaintiffs.

Ropers, Majeski, Kohn Bentley, Stephen M. Hayes, Stephen P. Ellingson, San Jose, CA, Attorneys for Defendant.


STIPULATION RE: (1) AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY DOES NOT-EXCEED $75,000 AND (2) VOLUNTARY REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiffs David Smith, Bettina Thompson Smith and Taylor Smith (hereinafter collectively "plaintiffs"), by and through their attorney of record, Donald L. Galine, and defendant Geico Indemnity Company (hereinafter "Geico"), by and through its: attorney of record, Stephen P. Ellingson of Ropers, Majeski, Kohn Bentley, as follows:

1. Plaintiffs' total recovery for any and all claims that have been or could be asserted in this lawsuit shall not exceed $75,000, individually or in the aggregate.

2. If the court, a jury, or any other trier of fact finds that plaintiffs' claims in this lawsuit have a value in excess of $75,000, individually as to any one claim or in the aggregate as to all of their claims, plaintiffs hereby waive and forever discharge Geico from any amount in excess of $75,000 and agree to hold Geico harmless from any disputes as to how the $75,000 maximum recovery would be allocated between plaintiffs as competing claimants for any such recovery.

3. Since plaintiffs herein stiputate that their total recovery, individually or in the aggregate, shall not exceed $75,000, plaintiffs and Geico hereby stipulate to remand this action to the San Mateo County Superior Court.

I. ORDER

Pursuant to the terms of this stipulation; the present action is HEREBY REMANDED to the San Mateo County Superior Court.


Summaries of

Smith v. Geico

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 21, 2003
CASE NO. C03-0537 WHA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2003)
Case details for

Smith v. Geico

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SMITH, BETTINA THOMPSON SMITH, TAYLOR SMITH, Plaintiffs, v. GEICO…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 21, 2003

Citations

CASE NO. C03-0537 WHA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2003)