From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Gaphardt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Apr 3, 2015
Civil No. 14-cv-430-SM (D.N.H. Apr. 3, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 14-cv-430-SM

04-03-2015

Randy Smith v. Clark Gaphardt

cc: Randy Smith, pro se


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Randy Smith filed a complaint (doc. no. 1), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court conducted a preliminary review of the complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and LR 4.3(d)(1), and found that Smith had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. In an Order (doc. no. 11) issued January 5, 2015, the court gave Smith the opportunity to amend his complaint by February 6, 2015. Smith has not filed any amendment to the complaint as directed. Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein and in the court's January 5, 2015, Order, the court recommends that the district judge dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief might be granted.

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's order. See United States v. De Jesús-Viera, 655 F.3d 52, 57 (1st Cir. 2011); Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010).

/s/_________

Andrea K. Johnstone

United States Magistrate Judge
April 3, 2015 cc: Randy Smith, pro se


Summaries of

Smith v. Gaphardt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Apr 3, 2015
Civil No. 14-cv-430-SM (D.N.H. Apr. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Gaphardt

Case Details

Full title:Randy Smith v. Clark Gaphardt

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Apr 3, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 14-cv-430-SM (D.N.H. Apr. 3, 2015)