From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Founders Life Assurance Co. of Florida

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 10, 1985
333 S.E.2d 5 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

70485.

DECIDED JUNE 10, 1985. REHEARING DENIED JUNE 28, 1985.

Action on policy. Bibb Superior Court. Before Judge Wilcox.

John R. Francisco, for appellant.

Lamar W. Sizemore, Jr., William H. Major, for appellee.


Daisy Smith sued Founders Life Assurance Company to recover $22,000 in death benefits allegedly owed her pursuant to a group insurance policy covering the employees of the Macon-Bibb County Water and Sewerage Authority, which had employed her deceased husband, George Edward Smith, prior to his death. She also sought a bad-faith penalty, punitive damages, and attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 33-4-6. Concluding as a matter of law that Mr. Smith was not covered under the terms of the policy, the trial court granted the insurance company's motion for summary judgment and denied Mrs. Smith's motion for summary judgment. Mrs. Smith appeals.

After working for the Macon-Bibb County Water and Sewerage Authority for many years, Mr. Smith was forced to cease working on March 24, 1983, due to the illness which ultimately resulted in his death. At the time of his death, which occurred on June 6, 1983, he was considered by the Authority to be a full-time employee on sick leave.

Prior to June 1, 1983, the Authority's employees, including Mr. Smith, had been covered by a policy of group insurance issued by Prudential Insurance Company. The Prudential policy expired on that date and was replaced by a policy issued by the appellee, Founders Life Assurance Company. Founders Life denied Mrs. Smith's claim for death benefits on the ground that Mr. Smith had not been "actively employed" or "actively working" between the effective date of the policy and the date of his death. Thereafter, Mrs. Smith submitted a claim for death benefits to Prudential Insurance Company, which paid her the full amount of such benefits due under the terms of its policy.

The Founders policy specifies that "each employee actively employed 30 or more hours per week . . . on the date of issue hereof is eligible for insurance from the date of issue . . ." However, the policy further provides as follows: "EFFECTIVE DATES OF INSURANCE. Each eligible employee shall become insured automatically on the date he becomes eligible for insurance except that an employee who is not actively at work . . . on such date shall not become insured until the next following day on which he is actively at work . . ." (Emphasis supplied.) The term "actively at work" is defined elsewhere in the policy to mean "the actual expenditure of time and energy in the service of the employer . . ."

Although Mr. Smith was undoubtedly "actively employed" by the Authority at the time of his death and was thus an "eligible" employee under the terms of the policy, it is undisputed that he had not been "actively at work" at any time between the date of his death and the policy's issue date. Therefore, under the unambiguous provisions of the policy governing the "effective dates of insurance," the coverage never took effect as to him. It necessarily follows that the trial court was correct in granting Founders Life's motion for summary judgment and in denying the appellant's motion for summary judgment. Accord Wilson v. Union Labor Life Ins. Co., 114 Ga. App. 330 ( 151 S.E.2d 550) (1966). We reject the appellant's contention that a fact issue exists as to whether the coverage became effective by estoppel, there being no suggestion in the record that Founders Life ever collected any premium payments from Mr. Smith, through the agency of his employer or otherwise. This fact distinguishes the present case from such cases as Cason v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 91 Ga. App. 323, 332 ( 85 S.E.2d 568) (1954), and American Home Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Harvey, 99 Ga. App. 582 (1) (b) ( 109 S.E.2d 322) (1959). See generally Dawes Mining Co. v. Callahan, 246 Ga. 531, 533-534 ( 272 S.E.2d 267) (1980); McFarland v. Business Men's Assur. Co., 105 Ga. App. 209 (4) ( 124 S.E.2d 432) (1962).

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.

DECIDED JUNE 10, 1985 — REHEARING DENIED JUNE 28, 1985.


Summaries of

Smith v. Founders Life Assurance Co. of Florida

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 10, 1985
333 S.E.2d 5 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Smith v. Founders Life Assurance Co. of Florida

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. FOUNDERS LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 10, 1985

Citations

333 S.E.2d 5 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
333 S.E.2d 5

Citing Cases

Roberson v. McIntosh Cnty. Sch. Dist.

For all these reasons, Roberson cannot show that the trial court erred when it granted Standard summary…

United of Omaha Life Ins. v. Sun Life Ins. Co.

The language of the policy is clear, and had the booklet with this language been available to Sun Life at the…