From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Ferro Plumbing & Heating Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2021
20 Civ. 6485 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 6485 (NSR)

12-08-2021

SMITH, Plaintiff(s), v. FERRO PLUMBING & HEATING INC., et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER

Nelson S. Roman, U.S.D.J.:

The Court having been advised by letter, dated December 8, 2021, from Plaintiff's counsel Robert Salaman, that a verbal settlement in principle has been reached, it is

ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within sixty (60) days of the date hereof.

The parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next 60 days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

The Court adjourns sine die the December 14, 2021 teleconference. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion (doc. 30).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Ferro Plumbing & Heating Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2021
20 Civ. 6485 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Ferro Plumbing & Heating Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SMITH, Plaintiff(s), v. FERRO PLUMBING & HEATING INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 6485 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2021)