From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Euton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-626 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-626

01-15-2013

WILLIE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH EUTON, Defendant.


Judge Timothy S. Black


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

More than 120 days have passed since the complaint was filed in this civil action. (Doc. 1). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), "[i]f a service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the court . . . shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to that defendant." On December 31, 2012, Plaintiff was ordered to show why the complaint should not be dismissed for failure of service of process. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff failed to do so. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED

_________________________________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Euton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-626 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Euton

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH EUTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-626 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)