From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Edge

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv909-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 8, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv909-MHT (WO)

01-08-2016

CONNIE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT EDGE, II, and PFG TRANSCO, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

The court having been informed that this cause is now settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and with leave to the parties, within 49 days, to stipulate to a different basis for dismissal or to stipulate to the entry of judgment instead of dismissal, and with leave to any party to file, within 49 days, a motion to have the dismissal set aside and the case reinstated or the settlement enforced, should the settlement not be consummated.

It is further ORDERED that all outstanding motions are denied as moot.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 8th day of January, 2016.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Edge

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv909-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. Edge

Case Details

Full title:CONNIE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT EDGE, II, and PFG TRANSCO, Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv909-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 8, 2016)