From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Duffy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 12, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0864 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0864 AC P

12-12-2013

DARRELL ANTHONY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. DUFFY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 25) is denied.

________________________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Duffy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 12, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0864 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Duffy

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL ANTHONY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. DUFFY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 12, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0864 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2013)