From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Diaz

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 19, 2024
4:20-cv-04335-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)

Opinion

4:20-cv-04335-HSG

07-19-2024

C. JAY SMITH, et al., Plaintiff, v. R. DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

ROB BONTA Attorney General of California PREETI K. BAJWA Supervising Deputy Attorney General ERIC MIERSMA Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Diaz, Davis, Feston, Haub, Bloise, Franco, Duke, and Taylor JENNIFER ORTHWEIN ALEXANDER BROOKS Attorneys for Plaintiff


ROB BONTA Attorney General of California

PREETI K. BAJWA Supervising Deputy Attorney General

ERIC MIERSMA Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants Diaz, Davis, Feston, Haub, Bloise, Franco, Duke, and Taylor

JENNIFER ORTHWEIN ALEXANDER BROOKS Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOINT REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION; DECLARATION OF ERIC MIERSMA; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

The parties jointly move this Court under Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-11 for an extension of the twenty-five page limit, set forth in Local Rule 7-2(b), 7-3(a), and 7-4(b), by five additional pages, to thirty pages for both the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and for Plaintiff's Opposition. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment must be filed by July 25, 2024. This Motion for five additional pages is based on this Motion, the supporting Declaration of Eric Miersma, and the file in this matter.

For all the reasons stated in the defense counsel's declaration, and given the breadth of the issues covered by Defendants' summary judgment motion, Defendants respectfully request that the Court extend the page limitation for both the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and for Plaintiff's Opposition by five pages, from twenty-five to thirty pages.

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

I hereby attest, pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that I obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from the signatories indicated by the conformed signature (/s/).

Eric Miersma

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation by the parties and good cause appearing, the Joint Request for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation for Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Opposition is GRANTED. The page limit for the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and for Plaintiff's Opposition are both extended by five pages, from twenty-five to thirty pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Diaz

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 19, 2024
4:20-cv-04335-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:C. JAY SMITH, et al., Plaintiff, v. R. DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2024

Citations

4:20-cv-04335-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)