From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division
Mar 14, 1946
5 F.R.D. 298 (D. Minn. 1946)

Opinion

         Action by Day Smith, individually, and Day Smith, as agent, and Day Smith, as representative of all other employees of the Cudahy Packing Company, a corporation, similarly situated, against the Cudahy Packing Company, a corporation, to recover overtime wages, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees allegedly due under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

         Order in accordance with opinion.

          George W. Colburn, of Minneapolis, Minn., and John Edmund Burke, of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff.

          Loring M. Staples and John S. Pillsbury, Jr., both of Minneapolis, Minn. (Faegre & Benson, of Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel), for defendant.


          DONOVAN, District Judge.

         This action was commenced by plainiff pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover $5,000,000. It is a companion case to the suit entitled Schempf, Plaintiff, v. Armour & Co., Defendant, D.C., 5 F.R.D. 294.

         The complaint in this case is identical to that in the case of Schempf v. Armour & Co., except as to the parties, employees named and amount of recovery sought. Preliminary proceedings similar to those in the Schempf case were initiated by defendant for the purpose of discovery and production by plaintiff of written authority to act as agent for the employees named in paragraph V of the complaint.

         It is difficult for the plaintiff to proceed other than as approved and outlined in the Schempf case. Plaintiff cannot be expected to do more than state a cause of action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and furnish his written authority for the employees named in paragraph V of the complaint, and the deposition certified to by United States Commissioner William T. Goddard.

         In accordance with the views expressed by the Court in the Schempf case, all unnamed employees will be allowed twenty (20) days from the filing date hereof to intervene or have the record show that plaintiff has been designated by them as their agent or representative to maintain this action in their behalf.


Summaries of

Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division
Mar 14, 1946
5 F.R.D. 298 (D. Minn. 1946)
Case details for

Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. CUDAHY PACKING CO.

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division

Date published: Mar 14, 1946

Citations

5 F.R.D. 298 (D. Minn. 1946)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.

Motions denied. See also 5 F.R.D. 298. DONOVAN, District…