From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Crilly

Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, March Term, 1926
Apr 8, 1926
132 A. 900 (Conn. 1926)

Opinion

Argued March 2d 1926

Decided April 8th, 1926.

ACTION to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by defendant's negligence, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the jury before Simpson, J.; verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $4,000, and appeal by defendant. No error.

Thomas Hewes, with whom was Richard H. Phillips, for the appellant (defendant).

James B. Henry, for the appellee (plaintiff).


The plaintiff claimed to have proved that the injuries for which she seeks to recover damages occurred in an automobile accident and were caused by the failure of the defendant's wife in driving his car to keep it under control in consequence of the excessive speed at which, and the manner in which, she was driving. The defendant claimed to have proved that the cause of the failure of his wife to keep the car under control was due to the binding of the steering mechanism of the car, thus causing it to become rigid. The jury might reasonably have found either theory proven, and therefore the trial court was without power to have granted defendant's motion and set aside the verdict.


Summaries of

Smith v. Crilly

Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, March Term, 1926
Apr 8, 1926
132 A. 900 (Conn. 1926)
Case details for

Smith v. Crilly

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES A. SMITH vs. JOHN A. CRILLY, JR

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut First Judicial District, Hartford, March Term, 1926

Date published: Apr 8, 1926

Citations

132 A. 900 (Conn. 1926)
132 A. 900