From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Dec 19, 2023
3:20-cv-282 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2023)

Opinion

3:20-cv-282

12-19-2023

CURTIS SMITH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

JEFFREY VINCB BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 2, 2023, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Dkt. 24. Judge Edison filed a memorandum and recommendation on November 16, 2023, recommending that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 18) be granted, and the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 21) be denied. Dkt. 25.

No objections have been filed to the memorandum and recommendation. Accordingly, the court reviews it for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record.

Accordingly:

(1) Judge Edison's memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 25) is approved and adopted in its entirety as the holding of the court; and

(2) Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 18) is granted, and the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 21) is denied; and

(3) This case is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with Judge Edison's memorandum and recommendation.


Summaries of

Smith v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Dec 19, 2023
3:20-cv-282 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS SMITH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Dec 19, 2023

Citations

3:20-cv-282 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2023)

Citing Cases

Lee v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

He cites to Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security, in which the court found a direct and obvious conflict…