From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 24, 2022
No. 5132-21S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

5132-21S

06-24-2022

CLIFTON SMITH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION

Peter J. Panuthos, Special Trial Judge.

This case was called from the calendar for the remote Trial Session of the Court at Chicago, Illinois on June 13, 2022. There was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioner. Counsel for respondent appeared and was heard. Counsel for respondent orally moved the Court to dismiss the case for lack of prosecution. Upon due consideration, and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceeding, it is

ORDERED that respondent's oral motion is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is further

ORDERED AND DECIDED that there is a deficiency in income tax due from petitioner in the amount of $23,014.00 for the 2018 taxable year, and that there is a section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty for the tax year 2018 due from petitioner in the amount of $2,445.00.


Summaries of

Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 24, 2022
No. 5132-21S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON SMITH, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

Citations

No. 5132-21S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 24, 2022)