From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Comm'r

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 18, 2016
6:15-cv-00383-CL (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2016)

Opinion

6:15-cv-00383-CL

04-18-2016

REBECCA CROLYN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 19), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

In her objections to the Findings and Recommendation, plaintiff raises some objections not presented to Judge Clarke. I decline to address those arguments. See B & K Livestock Auction, Inc. v. Oregon Dep't of Envtl. Quality, No. 3:12-CV-2085-PK, 2013 WL 3973880, at *2 (D. Or. July 31, 2013); Container Recovery, Inc. v. Shasta Nw, Inc., No. CV 05-1749-PK, 2007 WL 1724937, at *1 (D. Or. June 11, 2007); Aleck v. United States of America, CV 04-277-AS, 2005 WL 2709502 (D. Or. Oct. 21, 2005).

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) is adopted in full. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 18th day of April, 2016.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Comm'r

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 18, 2016
6:15-cv-00383-CL (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. Comm'r

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA CROLYN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 18, 2016

Citations

6:15-cv-00383-CL (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2016)