From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jun 4, 2008
Case No. 1:07cv199 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 4, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07cv199.

June 4, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on May 13, 2008 (Doc. 9).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. This matter is terminated from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jun 4, 2008
Case No. 1:07cv199 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:Carolyn A. Smith, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jun 4, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:07cv199 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Astrue

To be "material," new evidence (1) must be relevant to and probative of an applicant's condition prior to the…

David P. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

To be “material,” new evidence (1) must be relevant to and probative of an applicant's condition prior to the…