Opinion
No. 11-7391
04-02-2012
DANNY RAYBURN SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COUNTY OF PICKENS; SHERIFF DAVID STONE, Pickens County Sheriff; DEWEY SMITH, Captain; ANDERSON COUNTY; MICHAEL SLOAN, Detective; DAN RHODES; GREENVILLE COUNTY; DAVID HANKS, Detective; LARRY MARTIN, Detective, Defendants - Appellees.
Danny Rayburn Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O'ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina; J. Calhoun Pruitt, Jr., PRUITT AND PRUITT, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:10-cv-02265-JMC)
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Rayburn Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O'ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina; J. Calhoun Pruitt, Jr., PRUITT AND PRUITT, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Danny Rayburn Smith appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. County of Pickens, No. 8:10-cv-02265-JMC (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2011; Oct. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED