From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. City of Stockton

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2015
2:15-cv-00363-GEB-AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2015)

Opinion


Nathaniel Smith, Plaintiff, v. City of Stockton, Officer Mayer, Officer Robin Harrison, Officer Michael Perez, and former Chief of Police Blair Ulring, in their individual capacities; and Chief of Police Eric Jones, in his official capacity, Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-00363-GEB-AC United States District Court, E.D. California. October 20, 2015

          ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.

         Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation to file First Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 21), Plaintiff is granted leave to file the First Amended Complaint, which was filed as Exhibit A to the referenced stipulation, no later than October 23, 2015; all answers already filed are hereby deemed responsive to the First Amended Complaint as the operative complaint; and, all Defendants who have not yet filed an Answer shall file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within ten (10) days of the date the First Amended Complaint is filed.


Summaries of

Smith v. City of Stockton

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2015
2:15-cv-00363-GEB-AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. City of Stockton

Case Details

Full title:Nathaniel Smith, Plaintiff, v. City of Stockton, Officer Mayer, Officer…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-00363-GEB-AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2015)