From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. City of New Haven

Workers' Compensation Commission
Apr 20, 1992
1154 CRD 3 (Conn. Work Comp. 1992)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1154 CRD-3-90-12

APRIL 20, 1992

The claimant was represented at trial by Charles Flynn, Esq. No one appeared for the claimant at oral argument. No brief was filed in the instant appeal.

The respondent was represented by Frank Grazioso, Esq. at trial and on appeal by Samuel Dixon, Jr., Esq. No brief was filed in the instant appeal.

This Petition for Review from the December 20, 1990 Finding and Award of the Commissioner At Large acting for the Third District was heard November 22, 1991 before a Compensation Review Division panel consisting of the Commission Chairman, John Arcudi and Commissioners Gerald Kolinsky and Donald H. Doyle.


OPINION


The respondent has filed a Petition for Review from the December 20, 1990 Finding and Award of the Commissioner at Large acting for the Third District. In that Finding and Award the trial commissioner awarded the claimant benefits pursuant to Sec. 7-433c.

No Reasons of Appeal nor brief was filed by the respondent appellant. We therefore dismiss for failure to prosecute. See Practice Book Sec. 4055.

Commissioners Gerald Kolinsky and Donald H. Doyle concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. City of New Haven

Workers' Compensation Commission
Apr 20, 1992
1154 CRD 3 (Conn. Work Comp. 1992)
Case details for

Smith v. City of New Haven

Case Details

Full title:VERNIS SMITH, CLAIMANT-APPELLEE v. CITY OF NEW HAVEN, EMPLOYER…

Court:Workers' Compensation Commission

Date published: Apr 20, 1992

Citations

1154 CRD 3 (Conn. Work Comp. 1992)

Citing Cases

Sinkoski v. Continental Auto

As the claimant has not filed Reasons of Appeal, appeared or submitted a brief, we must dismiss his appeal…

PERKINS v. RUDY FOGG SON

See Practice Book Sec. 4055; Sinkowski v. Continental Auto, 1398 CRB-8-92-3 (decided November 9, 1993). Jones…