From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. City of Miami Beach

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 26, 1969
220 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1969)

Opinion

No. 37850.

March 26, 1969.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District.

Melvin I. Muroff, Miami, for petitioners.

Joseph A. Wanick, City Atty., and Ira M. Elegant, Asst. City Atty., for respondent.


Certiorari was granted in this case because of conflict between the decision here involved, Fla.App. 213 So.2d 281, and the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in City of St. Petersburg v. Aikin, 208 So.2d 268. The decision in the Aikin case has been quashed by this court in a decision which became effective subsequent to granting of certiorari. See City of St. Petersburg v. Aikin, Fla., 217 So.2d 315.

No conflict now existing, it is ordered that the writ heretofore issued be and the same is hereby

Discharged.

ROBERTS, Acting C.J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. City of Miami Beach

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 26, 1969
220 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1969)
Case details for

Smith v. City of Miami Beach

Case Details

Full title:F. ROUSE SMITH AND ANNIE LOYS SMITH, HIS WIFE, DeMARIS INVESTING CO., A…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 26, 1969

Citations

220 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1969)