From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 9, 2012
CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-07-DBH (D. Me. Oct. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-07-DBH

10-09-2012

MONTE SMITH, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 29, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The plaintiff filed his objection to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision on September 17, 2012. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore O RDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby A DOPTED. The motion to remand is G RANTED. The plaintiff shall receive a full de novo hearing on remand, as the Commissioner's counsel has agreed. Def.'s Reply to Pl.'s Objection to Recommended Dec. to Remand at 2 (ECF No. 18).

SO ORDERED.

_________________

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 9, 2012
CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-07-DBH (D. Me. Oct. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MONTE SMITH, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Oct 9, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-07-DBH (D. Me. Oct. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

Wilfredo M. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

As such, the Troy D. court “grant[ed] the parties' request to remand, and remand[ed] for further proceedings…