From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jan 7, 2009
Case No. 3:08-cv-062 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cv-062.

January 7, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 12), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on January 5, 2009, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision that Plaintiff was not disabled and therefore not entitled to benefits under the Act be, and it hereby is, affirmed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jan 7, 2009
Case No. 3:08-cv-062 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY J. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jan 7, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:08-cv-062 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2009)