From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Apple, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 22, 2024
4:21-cv-09527-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024)

Opinion

4:21-cv-09527-HSG

01-22-2024

CHRIS SMITH, CHERYL SMITH, KAREN SMITHSON, ALBERTO CORNEA, MICHELLE ROGERS, DEBORAH CLASS, AMBER JONES, ALEXIS KEISER, LOORN SALEE, THOMAS PEAR, and TANNAISHA SMALLWOOD, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW UNDER L.R. 11-5(A)

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., United States District Judge

Having considered Plaintiffs' Motion and pursuant to Civil Local Rule 11-5(a), this Court finds that Counsel has submitted satisfactory reasoning for withdrawal, and that the granting of his Motion will not cause substantial prejudice or delay to any party. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion for Ra O. Amen to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiffs in the above-captioned litigation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ra O. Amen is hereby terminated as counsel for Plaintiff in this proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Apple, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 22, 2024
4:21-cv-09527-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. Apple, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS SMITH, CHERYL SMITH, KAREN SMITHSON, ALBERTO CORNEA, MICHELLE…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 22, 2024

Citations

4:21-cv-09527-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024)