From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
1:22-cv-01580-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01580-SAB (PC)

02-07-2023

FREDRICK WAYNE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE OR SUBMIT AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION (ECF NO. 5)

Plaintiff Fredrick Wayne Smith is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 12, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee within forty-five (45) days. (ECF No. 5) On December 19, 2022, the Court received a check for $400.00, which was returned to Plaintiff with instructions to submit the total amount of $402.00. (ECF No. 6.)

Plaintiff has not submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute; and
2. The Clerk of Court shall not return any check received by Plaintiff for the filing fee in this action without a judicial order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
1:22-cv-01580-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:FREDRICK WAYNE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-01580-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)