From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 28, 2022
2:21-CV-2080-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-2080-TLN-DMC-P

04-28-2022

GILBERT EARL SMITH, Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion, ECF No. 18, for a 32-day extension of time to file a traverse. The motion is unopposed and is granted. Petitioner may file a traverse within 32 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Allen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 28, 2022
2:21-CV-2080-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT EARL SMITH, Petitioner, v. TRENT ALLEN, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 28, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-2080-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2022)