From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith-Mayers v. Mayers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
May 26, 2004
855 A.2d 146 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2004)

Summary

In Mayers v. Smith, 121 Ill. 442 (while passing upon the third panel and before it was accepted by them and before any of the jurors were sworn and while the defendants had two unused peremptory challenges) defendants offered to challenge peremptorily two jurors, who were in the panels previously accepted but who had not been sworn.

Summary of this case from Maher v. New York, C. St. L. R. Co.

Opinion

No. 1255 WDA 2003.

May 26, 2004.

Appeal from the Allegheny County, FD 98-8635.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Smith-Mayers v. Mayers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
May 26, 2004
855 A.2d 146 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2004)

In Mayers v. Smith, 121 Ill. 442 (while passing upon the third panel and before it was accepted by them and before any of the jurors were sworn and while the defendants had two unused peremptory challenges) defendants offered to challenge peremptorily two jurors, who were in the panels previously accepted but who had not been sworn.

Summary of this case from Maher v. New York, C. St. L. R. Co.
Case details for

Smith-Mayers v. Mayers

Case Details

Full title:SMITH-MAYERS v. MAYERS

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 26, 2004

Citations

855 A.2d 146 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2004)

Citing Cases

Maher v. New York, C. St. L. R. Co.

The judgment was affirmed in 236 Ill. 19. In Mayers v. Smith, 121 Ill. 442 (while passing upon the third…

People v. Schmitz

No case was shown as required by the statute. ( People v. Rodriquez, 10 Cal. 59; People v. Reynolds, 16 Cal.…